On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 00:05 -0700, Luke Kanies wrote: > On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Though it's a massive PITA, would anyone be up to trying a comparison > > with RGL? > > > > I've had good luck with it and, in theory, it's as optimized as you > > can > > get in Ruby. > > It's been a while since I looked, but AFAIR RGL is just a ruby skin > over a C/C++ implementation of a graph library and, while relatively > fast, is also heinously non-ruby. As in, it feels really bad actually > writing code in it. > > Really, though, I'm probably misinformed, because I know more about > GRATR -- which was essentially a response to RGL -- than I do about > RGL itself, so we could probably do well to back-end off of it. > > I've also been considering experimenting with the java graph db. But > that's just because I ran into Emil again last night.
Are you talking about Neo4J or sth else? -- Brice Figureau Follow the latest Puppet Community evolutions on www.planetpuppet.org! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
