> Would it be possible to do something like:
>
> file { "/foo/voo/bar/baz" :
> ensure => directory,
> between => {
> start => "/foo",
> end => "/foo/voo/bar",
> owner => "foo",
> group => "foo",
> mode => 755, }
> between => {
> start => "/foo/voo/bar/baz",
> end => "/foo/voo/bar/baz",
> owner => "baz",
> group => "baz",
> mode => 775, }
>
> }
>
> or would that require re-writing chuncks of puppet?
There was a patch to support hashes:
http://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet/commit/75c32f910ea124a938a7035b3352c11a11b57d0c
So you could in theory write your own provider. Up until that patch
the Puppet DSL would not have supported the format you suggest.
>From another perspective. What's wrong with doing it this way:
file { ["/foo","/foo/voo","/foo/voo/bar" ]:
ensure => directory,
owner => "foo",
group => "foo",
mode => "0755"
}
file { "/foo/voo/bar/baz":
ensure => directory,
owner => "baz",
group => "baz",
mode => "0755"
}
Only the list seems a little wordy initially, but it won't take you
much longer to type then your suggestion.
ken.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
