On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:27 AM, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17/05/10 7:09 PM, David Schmitt wrote: >> On 5/17/2010 8:34 AM, Luke Kanies wrote: >>> On May 16, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Delves wrote: >>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> I'm wondering what the status of Puppet under Windows is. Is there a >>>> howto out there for testing this? >>> >>> David Schmitt is working on the Windows support right now, but we don't >>> yet have a timeline for having something testable, although it should be >>> soon. >> >> Yeah, I'm working on it :-) I've already managed to create my first >> File. It's all still very raw and will blow up if touching stuff where >> (the MRI for) windows deviates in behaviour from what puppet is used to. >> >> I'll push my version to github when I've got something approaching testable. > > David > > I've had quite a lot of feedback from people who have indicated that > a thin layered tool that integrates with WMI/PowerShell would suit > equally well as a fat client type/provider client.
I can see using powershell *inside* the provider, is that what you mean? > > What approach are you taking? > > How are you approaching packages? I'd hope we support MSI installation for a start and possibly do some type of unattended.txt/setup.txt support for answer files. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
