On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Rein, Paul, and I had a call today discussing whether we should produce a 1.6 > (I said no, unless there are high priority tickets that really need to be > worked on), and then what the design goals of 2.0 should be. I took notes on > our discussion and atempted to produce a doc capturing it all: > > http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/facter/wiki/ArchitectureForTwoDotOh
I have a few thoughts churning around about Facter having native support for storing fact evaluation history on the client, which ties into the open feature request for caching fact values, and I noticed you reference a ttl option in #4565. Simplifying the DSL for the common case is hugely appealing. > > Comments appreciated. > > -- > Sabbagh's Second Law: > The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it > has occurred. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- +1(615)594-8199 > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
