On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm perfectly ok with having a core set of facts that are indeed more >> important than the rest. > > I don't think I even understand your proposal (the bits about saving to disk, > especially), so it's hard for me to think it's a good idea. Run 1: Parameters are written to disk using templates/content attributes. Run 2: Fact reads same location, generating facts for each entry. Multiple runs is the only way I can see to make a link from node parameters to facts. Node parameters are easy to use to manage whether a fact is executed or not. Facts are the only way we can actually confine a fact. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
