On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:33 PM, R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- "Paul Berry" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. Make low-end scaling easier: currently when a customer's deployment >> gets too large to be handled by a single master running Webrick, they >> have to install apache/passenger or mongrel. This can be difficult to >> do, especially since passenger has limited package support on some >> OSes (notably RHEL/Centos 5). It would be nice to give people a less >> painful way of scaling up beyond what Webrick is capable of handling. > > I'd agree with Brice here, using Passenger would still be the easy option > here.
Me too. Passenger is pretty straight forward these days with the RPM's I've built and published at http://yum.puppetlabs.com/prosvc/ These have worked quite well and alleviate the need to try the different combinations of passenger, rack, and puppet versions. I believe this is now more of a communication problem than a technical problem. Good documentation and possibly puppet modules need to be published to utilize this passenger configuration. -- Jeff McCune http://www.puppetlabs.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
