On 10/15/2010 12:17 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Markus Roberts wrote:I went back and re-read the thread about autoloading (http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev/browse_thread/thread/2228455628cf083c/7aa89c325721fe08), and my understanding of the consensus was different: I thought we decided that we would prohibit files from containing classes that were unrelated to the filename, but we would still permit nesting and multiple classes per file. So, for instance, a file foo.pp would be allowed to contain "class foo { }" or "class foo::bar { }" or even "class foo { class bar { } }", but not "class bar { }". That had been my impression as well.That's what I prefer.
+1, it'd be mightily annoying to have to split off the ::disabled class into a subdirectory or some such stuff.
D. -- dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web: http://dasz.at Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
