On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Stefan Schulte > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:04:11AM -0800, Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Thomas Hallgren <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > One thing I've always found very useful when discussing proposals like >>> > this >>> > is to use the issue tracking system early on. It's easy to cross reference >>> > even individual comments and also to obtain links to them when referencing >>> > from email. Aside from the ability to comment anonymously, it fits Nigel's >>> > bullets very well. >>> >>> I think you're right, lets try using the ticket tracker. We can get >>> almost everything we need from it. >>> >> Nigel, have you already opened a ticket for this? I cannot find any. >> >> I have to admit that at first I thought that I wouldnt need such a >> feature. But after I got the basic idead of how this could be used I >> soon started to miss it ;-). > > This will definitely go out next week, apologies for the delay. > > Glad to see it piquing some interest at least :) >
Tying off this thread: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/6079 (proper announcement coming) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
