During review James Turnbull points out that this is still a fairly fragile approach; the next version improves that significantly.
Daniel On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:19, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> > > When this test was implemented the 'inspect' application had not yet landed, > the introduction of which caused a test failure to crop up. It also compared > two arrays that were not inherently ordered, allowing gratuitous test failures > to creep on in. -- ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com ✉ Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> ✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775 ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
