On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Jacob Helwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:22:39 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > > How much closer to ruby 1.9 compatibility should this release be? Would > it > > be helpful if I make an Arch Package that is built against ruby 1.9 for > > testing? > > > > -Thomas S Hatch > > > > About as close as 2.6.4 was. ;) As far as I'm aware there hasn't > actually been any work on Ruby 1.9 support in the 2.6.x series, but I'd > have to check the revision history to confirm this. > > -- > Jacob Helwig > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJNYxdfAAoJEHJabXWGiqEBgXQMAMA3RU/dbKwnKlT3q0cN8dmK > b6b3mp7+pkEqEOZL4WiDPto+8n352QbeeX+2vojbQE/tTLyzoKPUiEunHb74wsvz > 4crdOs5xPBEg2WC6sfJzRCv/Q4QMo+L6AH473Hcz8foeB6tZoA1vbtRTDZTjz0D0 > 4DF361frfNT+w1VkzDghL29y5FP8hh7e0u3b2F+uLC2jDmdAhKxLXKOEdad3QbHv > pftLDg9vKd8uAQ1vaQQeleDOyCNZgdopCIF1H7QTGI2e2wXetg/MXxp5eO/D4y/2 > qbNpsA1KaGg7Lgi3/WFcZ8OcZ6Ofq6y/p+pmfhLj18RA5UDBgxWjKlJlRxLwMwBA > PjwSmpMer9yQ1QQE2rQhWFAy8fvtZfOJGOX4lCNe54xVUE58zVbcqxlYGoFPqlhn > HJE/5HXRoymkviLFlLzQw7aGJQ0XEtQQtn2sb3vCbJmO/9nSnyjKlhLZv8ZHPv5G > PzWLkiS4Yrnf0oGkrcT+AMBItd6mn7k81EPCac+WQw== > =S8yj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Thanks, thats what I thought, but I figure it is worth checking every now and then. As the Arch Linux puppet maintainer I am looking forward to Ruby 1.9 support since Arch is on ruby 1.9. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help, I don't have time to hack on the problem but I am excited to help with testing. -Thomas S Hatch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
