On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Does this use a different db than storeconfigs? >>>> >>>> Aren't the facts already available in storeconfigs? >>>> >>>> This seems an odd choice, if the answer to both of those questions is yes. >>> >>> There was an RFC about this design choice: >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/e1b59e17fa5e9d2a >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev/browse_thread/thread/e1b59e17fa5e9d2a >> >> Hmm, those threads got one reply from a non-PL dev, and that one reply >> recommended that we use the same tables. > > That was more to point out that if we're discussing the design choice, > it's probably more productive to continue in those threads than > anything else.
Ah, I see. I'll drop it. -- Getting caught is the mother of invention. --Robert Byrne --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- +1(615)594-8199 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
