On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Ian Ward Comfort <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2011, at 7:11 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Please note that 2.6.6 is in Fedora and EPEL testing repositories. I > don't plan to update puppet there until 2.6.6 is pushed to the stable > updates repos in a few weeks. Any help testing the 2.6.6 packages is most > welcome. Once that update is stable, we'll be better able to more closely > track the 2.6.x updates in the official repos. > > For what it's worth, we finally took the 2.6.x plunge with the 2.6.6 > packages in EPEL testing, and have had no problems with the upgrade. So > consider this a +1 for promotion to stable. > > -- > Ian Ward Comfort <[email protected]> > Systems Team Lead, Academic Computing Services, Stanford University > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > > Yes, I have been running my deployment on 2.6 for a while without incident, actually I have had far fewer problems running on 2.6 than I ever did on 0.2.5. Why are distros dragging their feet on including puppet 2.6? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
