On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 21:38, Nick Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Allowing the singleton_instance value to be expirable is unnecessary, because > there will never be a need for a different CA instance in the lifetime of a > master. Additionally, the master never expired its cache anyway. This was only > using the cacher so it could be expired for tests, so it can safely be > removed.
So, in testing some CA related code, I ended up having to stub the method to get a new instance of the CA each time. I don't think this is going to make any difference to that, but should it? Is there some other way I should be doing that? Daniel -- ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
