The resource injection seems to be working a treat so I'm going to stick with that.
You never did get back to me on the in-memory shared object though ;-). Thought I'd bring it up while I'm tossing around ridiculous ideas. Thanks! Trevor On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55, Trevor Vaughan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, the main issue was that I couldn't figure out how to inherit >> from another custom type. >> >> If you recall the concat module that I posted previously, I'm trying >> to do something that uses concat but has additional parameters. > > Awesome. That makes perfect sense. > >> I think I've figured out a workaround involving dynamically creating >> and injecting concat resources at the right spots but it feels weird. > > Hrm, yeah. You should be able to inherit like that; it /may/ require > manually triggering loading of the type, but I thought it already did > that. > > If you file a ticket with an example that reproduces this we will try > and get it fixed for you. > > -- > Daniel Pittman > ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com > ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 [email protected] -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
