> True. So what I suggested was either give nodes a special status to change > the top-scope, which seems to be universally acknowledged as a bad idea.
I would define it as 'universally acknowledged'. As an incremental change its not a bad idea, since it works in with what we've got. If we're going to take a bigger picture view and re-work a bunch of stuff, then everything changes and we'd need to review the whole proposal. ken. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
