I imagine that the fix would have to work with the two purposes of generating the documentation that I'm seeing here: general docs expressing all possible features and when they are available, and more specific docs that express what is currently available on a particular system. I would guess that accurately doing the first might be more important than being able to also do the second, but I might be wrong.
On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Nick Fagerlund wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:33:12 AM UTC-7, Nick Lewis wrote: > ...so maybe the machine we generate the type reference on had shadow and > doesn't anymore. In any case, if the type reference is wrong, that's > something we should get straightened out. > > Haha ARGH, Nick has it right. That's frustrating, and the long-term fix for > it is not obvious. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-dev/-/Z6hXfpFDF4sJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
