> You do touch on something that I've been wondering about. We somehow have > ended > up with a 3.x branch, which would mean that master is really the 4.x > branch. I don't see > any point on us trying to work on 4.x when there isn't even a 3.x > release yet. Would anyone > be opposed to us getting rid of the 3.x branch? I think the flow would > then be that topics > merge onto master. At a release point we would merge master onto a > "3-stable" (or something, > I'm not sure about the name, 2.7.x is essentially 2.7-stable). Points > along "3-stable" would be > tagged as 3.0.0rc1, 3.0.0, 3.0.1rc1, etc.This is essentially the > stable/development strategy > for branching that gets talked about, I believe.
The extra 3.x branch is confusing and slightly superfluous agreed, at least until you attempt to gain stability for a 3.0.0 release by cutting the rc branch. So +1 for removing it. ken. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
