On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Andy Parker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yeah, even when a provider is specified it'll check the others to see >> if they would work. I'm not certain why that is done, but may not be >> needed. However, I dont' think it is causing the problem. >> > > Erm.. we seem to be having a communications breakdown. > I'm saying, that IS the problem :) > Particularly on a system like solaris, where it has multiple possible > package providers, so the other providers will note that they CAN > work, and maybe override stuff. > Not good, when I've explicitly defined the provider I want puppet to use.
I can see how there is a potential for a problem because of this behavior, but I haven't seen anything yet that tells me that is the problem you are seeing. Can you explain to me again what exactly the problem is that you are seeing and why you think that it checking other providers even when one is specified is causing that problem? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
