On Tuesday 13 November 2012 at 00:59, Andy Parker wrote:
> At the moment Proposal 4 is looking the most promising. It is to pretty much 
> undo the changes for #2935 (which added run_mode) and change to a 
> configuration system such that each subcommand has a section in the 
> configuration file. This means that we can statically know what part of the 
> configuration file to use for any given subcommand without first having to 
> load any code first.  
>  
> I've hacked (and hacked is really the right word) together some changes that 
> start doing this on a branch in my repo. 
> https://github.com/zaphod42/puppet/tree/spike/master/subcommands-as-conf-sections
>   
>  
> Any changes around this could have wide ranging impact and so we really need 
> to make sure we get this right. Can anyone think of what doing this would 
> horribly break? Other solutions that would achieve similar results, but might 
> work better?
Wouldn't doing this would require configuration changes in some use cases? For 
example I have puppet masters that are clients to other puppet masters with a 
different CA, so in the master section I have a different ssldir. With this 
change I would have to copy that to a "cert" and "ca" section as well.

I'm kind of okay with doing that, but it is definitely not a backwards 
compatible change, so for puppet 4.0? :)

--  
Erik Dalén



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to