On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Nan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'll admit, though, that puppet doesn't really have a concept of an "in >>> progress" convergence of a resource, so I'm not sure how the report will >>> work out for these kinds of resources. I suspect that it would show a >>> change every time that puppet runs and the replication is still in progress. > > The problem is failing is a bit misleading. Certainly an interesting use case > if we can mark the resource as pending and subsequent resources simply noop, > but as it stands we can't do anything like this: > > $ puppet apply tests/transition.pp > warning: Could not retrieve fact fqdn > notice: /Stage[main]//Transition[/tmp/demo_a]/ensure: current_value absent, > should be present Progress: 0.0 % (pending) > notice: /Stage[main]//Notify[complete]/message: current_value absent, should > be complete (noop) > notice: Finished catalog run in 0.08 seconds > > Andy, is this worth filing a feature request?
I think we can record this in a feature request. There has been this case of wanting to control slow resource and another one from Dan where he wanted to control virtual machines. > > Thanks, > > Nan > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
