On 29 April 2013 08:46, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: > No - that's more about running a given chunk of code periodically, but not > informing the user specifically, and I think what Dean is more looking for > is a reminder to the user to delete some configuration code that's no > longer relevant. >
That's exactly it. I no longer work with the people that use this metaparam so I've got no major investment in which implementation approach to take but I'd like to finish it off for the next time it comes up. I agree with Dustin that a function in stdlib would cover the class level thing but I think a metaparam is still the way to go for finer grained deprecations. I'm happy to write a function based version for now but I'd be interested in peoples view of the metaparam approach. Dean -- Dean Wilson http://www.unixdaemon.net Profanity is the one language all programmers understand --- Anon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
