On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 2:33:05 PM UTC+2, henrik lindberg wrote: > > - the parts written in ruby are much more difficult to deal with: are > they correct? what may I touch/modify, etc... what is the API? > > - the function namespace is flat and I you to name functions with long > names to be certain they do not clash across modules. I can't hide my > functions - it becomes a flea-market. Instead, I have seen that people > tend to use inline templates with Ruby snippets since they do not have > to be named. Have also seen complicated functions that look like > swiss-army-knifes having lots of flags and options to also do data > transformations. >
These points make a lot of sense, thank you for the answer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
