On Monday, July 15, 2013 11:53:10 AM UTC-5, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > I just went to +1 this on #3946. I ran into a very similar situation > recently and was quite annoyed to find that the Providers didn't have a > 'finish' equivalent to the Types. > > Nan has a very good point that it needs to survive a dependency failure. > Almost like all downstream providers after the failure should be able to > look up a variable set in their parent path for failures to be able to make > adjustments based on being called after a failure vice a normal chain. >
Hey Trevor, How are you handling this right now? You mentioned 'counting resources'; I'd be interested in an elaboration if you'd be willing to give one. Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
