On Aug 15, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Jeff McCune <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Andy Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are we making any effort to help ensure end users who refactor their code > don't end up with dramatically different behavior? > > The only effort that we are making, and that I think we can make, is to keep > promoting dependencies as the right way. As we were putting together tests > for this there were a couple cases that caught us by surprise about the order > in which things would be executed because of the relationship between > dependencies and manifest order. > > This makes sense, but I do wonder if there's a way to implement ordering of > resources within a manifest while also preserving the behavior of providing a > stable ordering between manifests and classes as a whole. > > Is it feasible to provide a stable ordering of manifest files, regardless of > the parse-order they were included, while also providing the parse ordering > of resources within a class? What is the goal of that? -- Luke Kanies | http://about.me/lak | http://puppetlabs.com/ | +1-615-594-8199 Join us at PuppetConf 2013, August 22-23 in San Francisco - http://bit.ly/pupconf13 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
