On 2013-26-08 2:26, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Henrik Lindberg
<[email protected]> wrote:
At the technical parsing level, yes. This is then validated to only include
what we want to allow. The first implementation is very permissive.
Oh! Then, my reading of the ARM was wrong - I thought that "Puppet
DSL" referred to the Puppet Ruby DSL. Now that I re-read the ARM, I
see that I was thrown off-track by the word "DSL", and read the rest
of the document based on that premise. Some examples will probably
prevent others from making this mistake -- particularly examples using
iteration (since that's the most common application of ruby
expressions in ERB).
Dustin
I find it is difficult to refer to "The Puppet Language", it does not
really have a name "Puppet DSL" is what it is called most of the time...
- henrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
