On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:12:20 PM UTC-6, Johan De Wit wrote: > > Learning to write custom types, I thought to validate the following > property > > Because we have thre possible values looking like minssf=<some value>, > the newvalues cannot be used (i think) > > And I wanted to add some specific validation for those types of values. > > Is this a good thinking path ? Or is that a No Go thing ? >
I think it's good to validate resource properties when the validity criteria are known independent of the characteristics of the target node. I think it's odd and a bit awkward to model saslsecprops as a single property instead of as separate properties for its several separate components. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/d9416bb9-c6c4-45d4-b369-a8316a797cb7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
