W dniu sobota, 18 stycznia 2014 18:20:16 UTC+1 użytkownik Felix Frank napisał: > > On 01/16/2014 01:01 AM, James Turnbull wrote: > > I think this is a broadly good idea but I've got one concern about the > > on ramp to using Puppet. Whatever is done, pull out some/pull out all, > > the user experience of getting started with Puppet should remain > > seamless or at least as good as it is now. For example, if there's > > suddenly another step to get started with Puppet, i.e.: > > > > 1. Install Puppet. > > 2. Add resources. > > 3. See Puppet in action. > > > > Then I think the getting started user experience suffers. Especially > > with so many tutorials out there that just assume various resources will > > be available. If the user gets some esoteric error (Dog forbid Puppet > > having an esoteric error :)) when they try to run a local .pp file or do > > a puppet resource then that's a big turn-off. > > > > Puppet's learning curve can be steep for many users. Let's not make it > > any harder. > > I feel that this is a very valid point. As Pawel pointed out, this can > be approached with package dependencies. > > Would it make sense to take this a step further and rename the remainder > of puppet to puppet-core and supplement it with, say, > puppet-core-modules? Puppet proper would comprise both. > > Just a thought. >
You may wish to look at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/puppet-bsd/g5DDPd3PL-U. These people seem to think about similar approach to packaging puppet for FreeBSD. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/cde00b49-7094-488b-bf54-3a660c4e43e7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
