Joined: Adrien, Henrik, Igor, Jeff Bechtel, Joshua, Kylo, Peter, Rob, Andrew, Ashley, Some random stoned guy
To address after review of actions from last time:: Puppet: Held over 2x: 2137: Held off last week because of CI failures. *Adrien* will grab right now - Waiting on windows spec failures 2200: We appear to have coverage of the pkg provider in our acceptance tests. Commits are mostly good. *Peter* will fix up 2 commits (no bug number prefix) and then merge it in. - It would cause a regression. Contributor pinged. Need some guidance on how to proceed. *Kylo* 2212: ping haus. *Dan* took a look and it looks like we just need to know the origin of the patches. Note added - Thread still going on. *Andy* pinged haus again. Held over 1x: stdlib: 198: Commented. Asked one of the contributors to handle the renaming. - *Andy* pinged them again 204: Closed. The change was strange and the real issue seems to be inside puppet Conversion continued after close - *Adrien* was going to find Nan and Dan in IRC and see about it, should it be reopened and revisited 213: Delaying until the next PR triage where Henrik is available. - *Henrik* to comment on the PR with where it stands and where it needs to go. Start conversation on puppet-dev to discuss the future of stdlib. New: Puppet: 2288: According to adrien, ashp has another PR that might collide with this. *Ashley *will pull it into his PR and close this one 2086: Ashley and Adrien will work out the details. Looks good. Want to change the provider name from ruby to ini file 2287: Failing tests. *Andy* left comment for erik to fix up the test 2286: Looks good. *Kylo* to merge in 2284: If they want it, they can have it :) *Joshua* to merge in 2282: Probably not quite the right direction. *Ashley* to follow up with the contributor 2281: Changes default squelch from true to false, which seems like it will regress Redmine #565. *Peter* to take a look and give feedback. 2277: It is technically backwards incompatible, but it is also just wrong behavior that it had before. *Henrik* will add a test and merge it in. 2276: Looks ok, but we need a little bit of backstory to justify that we can actually do this (When exactly did ubuntu drop init?). *Adrien* to look into 2269: Some packaging changes. *Andy* pinging haus 2268: Just another property. *Ashley* will fold it into the grand yumrepo fix up 2243/2238/2237: Basically looks good. *Adrien*'s comments haven't been addressed, but he'll just pick it up. 2236: Basic idea is in the right direction, but after a lot of discussion we came to the conclusion that this is a really a packaging time thing. *Andy* will write up a response and some suggestions on the PR. 2227/2226/2225/2130: Based on the direction that is happening on puppet-dev, it looks like these are going to sit there for a while as everything gets sorted out. *Kylo* will close them with a comment that we might reopen them later once we get external maintainers figured out better. -- Andrew Parker [email protected] Freenode: zaphod42 Twitter: @aparker42 Software Developer *Join us at PuppetConf 2014, September 23-24 in San Francisco* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANhgQXuw3PF2vwuGZsJy-w-6ZapMv9PZR8GVtmgy2K8KMUs1-w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
