On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Felix Frank <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 11:23 PM, Erik Dalén wrote:
> > No, removing it means they behave the same as for variables, so they
> > are either global or local. But not passed on through include
> > statements etc.
>
> Or even more specifically, variables have three scoping levels IIRC.
> 1. global scope
> 2. node scope
> 3. local scope
>
> And yes, this has proven amply powerful for variables and ought to
> suffice for resource defaults as well.
>
Sorry for missing the G+ discussion, so different behavior whether the
resource default is in site.pp, v.s. in node {} v.s. class ... {}?
Just to be clear, I want the following behavior (also isn't this how file
backup is configured?):
class { a:
file_line { 'bla::
...
# provider => ruby implied by site.pp resource defaults.
}
}
site.pp:
File_line {
provider => ruby,
}
include a
Thanks,
Nan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CACqVBqBJ%3Dk8Jarqeaxf-CghKy%2BVmSsNgftZpH0cCf%3D%3DECzZuPg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
