> On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Bomber <andrew.dolgovec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is any plans to implement lightweight puppetdb replacement for storeconfigs? > PuppetDB is ugly, i.e. has junkie API and _very_ heavy by itself because of > JVM, henve it is almost impossible to use it for testing masterless > environments, old active_record implementation was a solution, PuppetDB is > not. > > Yes, I've read a lot about active_record 'slowness' but never saw any test > (seems it was not published) proving this point. May be those test was made > using ruby 1.8 or something. Anyway, requesting for lightweight PuppetDB > replacement in pure ruby.
No, there are no such plans. Store configs isn't just slow, it's unusable at even small scale. The list archives should make it pretty clear that people couldn't use it. I don't agree that using the JVM makes PuppetDB too heavyweight to use for testing or in masterless environments. At least, that's not been the experience of our customers. PuppetDB works well for most of the use cases we know about, and we're definitely not going to invest in a second production-worthy service to compete with it. The API is pretty simple if you want to build one, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/-7572047912055463397%40unknownmsgid. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
