On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Felix Frank <felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de > wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 04:01 AM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > > * a later-in-the-day time (so US East Coast people could chime in > > after work) > > *mumble, grumble* Well, I guess that would free up my Wednesday every > other week... ;-) > Well, let's see if we have consensus before we change anything :) Also I *just* at this moment realized that those of us who moderate triage have a swath of meetings Wed afternoons (our sprints are Wed-based), so couldn't actually do anything then. So, hmmm, let's see what kind of consensus we build here. > > ad-hoc sessions, well - sure, if someone can just drag the PR team from > IRC to a hangout, that could be worthwhile. Good point, and actually we do just that at times. Basically just as a general note to contributors: if you have the right people's attention on IRC and the conversation could use IRL dialog, you can always ask for an impromptu hangout. > Here's another idea - I feel that "held over" PRs are limiting triage > throughput. It might just be me, but we're usually spending more than > half the time revisiting the stuff that was not yet concluded. 1. restructure the notes to form a lookup list, that allows the > moderator to look for notes on a specific PR when that PR comes up > Totally agree on too much time on "held over": last time it felt like a 30 minute preamble of bookkeeping, etc. That's actually what motivated me to try out the pre-triage notes experiment (linked above). I'm hoping that means we can just dive more directly into tackling PR code. So let's see if that change works and we can improve as we go. > 2. use a strict "least recently updated" order of PRs to look at > 3. perhaps prefaced with a "most recently updated" for such PRs that had > activity within the last seven days, i.e. since the previous triage > Ooh, that makes a lot of sense: so I think you're saying: first do a MRU sort just to pick up changes in the last week, then switch to LRU for long-neglected PRs that need a nudge. looking forward to more discussion. > Likewise. Thanks, as always, for your time! Kylo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CALsUZFHkuy%3Dk8VRg1eviW%3D8250m34QzwtuiBkhxw7WuSp0%3DBhA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
