I've already benchmarked and profiled Catalog's from_data_hash and 
to_data_hash methods using the benchmark framework.
Most of the time is spent in the from_data_hash (we already knew it) but 
there is no big "pitfalls" where Ruby loses his time.

My callgrind file shows that the top 5 (in self time) is :
- Array.flatten (55000 calls)
- Array.each (115089 calls)
- Puppet::Resource.initialize (15000 calls)
- String.=~ (65045 calls)
- Hash[]= (115084 calls)

This top 5 is taking ~30% of the total time .

As you can see, it can be dificult to optimize this. IMHO, the "benchmark 
-> tweak -> benchmark" way of optimizing is not sufficient here. I think 
the way it (de)serialize a catalog needs a deep refactor. 

Cheers,

Le mardi 30 juin 2015 04:23:42 UTC+2, henrik lindberg a écrit :
>
> On 2015-29-06 22:41, Trevor Vaughan wrote: 
> > If you get a profiling suite together (aka, bunch of random patches) 
> > could you release it? 
> > 
>
> It is not difficult actually. Look at the benchmarks in the puppet code 
> base. Many of them are suitable for profiling with a ruby profiler. 
> I don't think we have any benchmarks targeting the agent side though, so 
> the first thing to do (for someone) is to write one. 
>
> What is more difficult is coming up with a benchmark that does not 
> involve real/complex resources - but deserialization and up to actually 
> applying should be possible to work with in a simple way. 
>
> Profiling is then just running that benchmark with the ruby profiler 
> turned on and analyzing the result, make changes, run again... (repeat 
> until happy). 
>
> - henrik 
>
>
> > I've been curious about this for quite some time but never quite got 
> > around to dealing with it. 
> > 
> > My concern is very much client side performance since the more you 
> > managing a client, the less the client gets to do it's actual job. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > 
> > Trevor 
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Henrik Lindberg 
> > <henrik....@cloudsmith.com <javascript:> <mailto:
> henrik....@cloudsmith.com <javascript:>>> 
> > wrote: 
> > 
> >     On 2015-29-06 16 <tel:2015-29-06%2016>:48, Romain F. wrote: 
> > 
> >         Hi everyone, 
> > 
> >         I try to optimize our Puppet runs by running some benchmarks and 
> >         patching the puppet core (if possible). But I have some 
> difficulties 
> >         around the catalog serialization/deserialization. 
> > 
> >         In fact, in 3.7.5 or 3.8.x, the Config Retrieval takes roughly 
> >         7secs and 
> >         only 4 secs is on the master side. Same fact in 4.2 but with 9 
> >         secs of 
> >         config retrieval and still 4 secs on the master side. 
> > 
> >         My first thoughts was "Okay, time to try MsgPack". No 
> improvements. 
> > 
> >         I've instrumented a bit the code in the master branch around 
> >         this, and 
> >         I've found out that, on my 9secs of config retrieval, 3.61secs 
> >         is lost 
> >         in catalog deserialization, 2 secs is the catalog conversion.. 
> >         But it's 
> >         not the "real" deserialization (PSON to Hash) that takes ages, 
> >         it's the 
> >         creation of the Catalog object itself (Hash to catalog). 
> Benchmarks 
> >         shows that the time to deserialize MsgPack (or PSON) is 
> negligible 
> >         compared to the catalog deserialization time. 
> > 
> >         So here is my question : Is that a known issue ? Is there any 
> >         reason of 
> >         the regression in 4.x (Future parser creating more objects, ...) 
> ? 
> > 
> >     The parser=future setting only makes a difference when compiling the 
> >     catalog - the catalog itself does not contain more or different data 
> >     (except possibly using numbers instead of strings for some 
> attributes). 
> > 
> >     The best way to optimize this is to write a benchmark using the 
> >     benchmark framework and measure the time it takes to deserialize a 
> >     given catalog. Then run that benchmark with Ruby profiling turned 
> on. 
> > 
> >     There are quite a few things going on at the agent side in addition 
> >     to taking the catalog PSON and turning it into a catalog that it can 
> >     apply (loading types, resolving providers, etc). Make sure to 
> >     benchmark these separately if possible. 
> > 
> >     Regards 
> >     - henrik 
> > 
> >         Cheers, 
> > 
> >         -- 
> >         You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> Google 
> >         Groups "Puppet Developers" group. 
> >         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
> >         it, send 
> >         an email to puppet-dev+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> >         <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> 
>
> >         <mailto:puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> >         <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>>. 
>
> >         To view this discussion on the web visit 
> >         
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/a5bf7422-6119-43ee-ba11-44001c1ce097%40googlegroups.com
>  
> >         <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/a5bf7422-6119-43ee-ba11-44001c1ce097%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
>
> >         For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     -- 
> > 
> >     Visit my Blog "Puppet on the Edge" 
> >     http://puppet-on-the-edge.blogspot.se/ 
> > 
> >     -- 
> >     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >     Groups "Puppet Developers" group. 
> >     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> >     send an email to puppet-dev+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> >     <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>. 
> >     To view this discussion on the web visit 
> >     
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/mmsa75%24edc%241%40ger.gmane.org.
>  
>
> > 
> >     For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Trevor Vaughan 
> > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc 
> > (410) 541-6699 
> > 
> > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Puppet Developers" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > an email to puppet-dev+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> > <mailto:puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANs%2BFoXoa3sShf%2Bs9n4Pn9NJvbhDxJLNEe%3DeyO%2BCdjuvHLoNEg%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANs%2BFoXoa3sShf%2Bs9n4Pn9NJvbhDxJLNEe%3DeyO%2BCdjuvHLoNEg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
>
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
> -- 
>
> Visit my Blog "Puppet on the Edge" 
> http://puppet-on-the-edge.blogspot.se/ 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/5f33371f-98e3-429c-8906-8db54b1de717%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to