On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 11:56:24 AM UTC-5, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > I was thinking exactly the same as Eric. > > It seems like we're repeating what Git does. > > Perhaps I am too influenced by the "last known good" designation for something that in fact is *not* necessarily known to be good. Nevertheless, if Puppet is going to perform caching along the lines that Chris described at all, then maintaining a cache with genuine known goodness (or at least affirmatively asserted goodness) seems a natural extension that wouldn't require much more work.
John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/996bc122-d677-40bf-9e13-0ea965beec5f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
