Hi
>>> Foo::bar["default"] {
>>> [...]
>>> The only way I can get this syntax to work is to move the 'bar'
>>> definition outside of the foo class and refer to it by a name without
>>> '::' in it in foo2. Is there a way to override a definition with '::'
>>> in its name?
>> it's Foo::Bar["default"] {
>
> Let me just mention that this use of capitalization is *so totally
> bizarre*. And not really explained anywhere; what does it mean, why
> is it there at all?
capitalization is refering to an already defined object/resource (so to
an "instance" of foo::bar) in an inheritance chain. for me it totally
makes sense to divide between overwriting and actually defining resources.
greets pete
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
