David Lutterkort wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:26 -0500, Bryan Kearney wrote: > >> so.. the next question this is if we attempt the model of not executing >> unless changes are made at the initial scan, it is possible that some >> other change between steps 3.3 and 5.1 would have caused a change to >> occur. So... even if I reload there could be issues. >> > > Yes, though that's a general issue with puppet, and ultimately, there's > no good way to do check-and-change type operations on files, since they > can not be done atomically. I wouldn't sweat it; if you have a false > negative, the next puppet run will catch it ;) > > David > I agree with David.
Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
