Hello there David Actually, you had it at the first message :) and here is why i think that: the problem is that i can not guarantee the order of execution, so even if i define it at the top level, or more appropriately at the defaultnode level (why have two case statements ?) i still could not guarantee the statement will be evaluated at the right time. Whereas defining the scope at which the variable is set, i get around the issue entirely, because it forces the evaluation because puppet understands what i want. Regardless of the problem being caused by being in the wrong scope (unless of course it can not reach that scope) or because of order of evaluation.
That said i could be wrong, but it does look like it is fixing my problem ... So, thank you :) chakkerz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
