Cool, I agree epel-testing is probably better, and maybe once we're sure most of the easy bugs are cooked out in 0.25.1 we can get that into EPEL.
best regards, michael -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Turnbull Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet 0.25.0 release - EPEL? 2009/9/9 Todd Zullinger <[email protected]>: > Marziani, Michael wrote: >> Any idea how quickly we'll see this in EPEL? > > In addition to the link Larry posted for unofficial Fedora/EPEL > packages¹, I'd say we probably shouldn't rush this into the EPEL > repos. It's a large change and it's probably wise to let it see a bit > more testing before we push it to the official repos where folks who > don't always expect surprises would find it in an update. That said, > getting it into epel-testing before too long seems reasonable. > > And, of course, this is just my opinion. I've been known to be wrong > on occasion. ;) > We're also going to try to keep the release tempo up too. So when we've got sufficient comfort we've caught sufficient bugs we'll release 0.25.1 - probably within the next two weeks. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
