Hi, thanks for the quick answers. Did you create a link /var/lib/puppet that points to the nas share?
Did you use the autosign option? BR, Rene On Oct 29, 9:38 pm, Nicolas Szalay <nsza...@qualigaz.com> wrote: > This will definitely work, I have this setup : two puppetmasters, sharing a > vip with heartbeat, both running nginx + mongrel. /etc/puppet is populated > through subversion (automatic checkout). /var/lib/puppet is NFS mounted (SPOF, > could be an iSCSI disk with ocfs2 filesystem). This works perfectly since > months. > > Regards, > > Nico. > > ----- Mail Original ----- > De: "Rene" <rene.zbin...@gmail.com> > À: "Puppet Users" <puppet-users@googlegroups.com> > Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Octobre 2009 19:49:52 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne > / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne > Objet: [Puppet Users] puppetfailover > > Hi > > Today I tried to configure puppet forfailover. I would like to have > two puppet masters, one active and the other not active. Then I would > migrate the IP address, and puppet would become active on the other > node. Configuration I would like to put on a NAS share. > > Do you think this is feasible? Has anybody done that successfully? I > thought to put only /etc/puppet and the ssl directory on the nas. Will > that work? > > BR, Rene --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
