> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Just noticed that ssh::auth::server doesn't require the resource for ~/.ssh 
> directory.  Considering the documentation says it does (in Examples -> 1. 
> With 
> account management at the bottom mentions that 'require => [User[$title], 
> File["$home/.ssh"]]' is implicitly included in both client and server), I 
> thought I'll report it.
> 
> This works fine for ssh::auth::server because it uses a file resource for the 
> ~/.ssh/$filename file, so ~/.ssh is autorequired by puppet (if defined).

OK, thanks for pointing this out.  Looking back at it now, I think I was
probably counting on ssh_authorized_key requiring File[$home/.ssh].  But
that doesn't seem to be explicit anywhere, so I'll add it in explicitly for
the next point release.  And the user too, while I'm at it.

> Also, while I'm at it, I wanted to ask a question related to scoping.  Don't 
> know if it's another difference between puppet 0.24.8 and 0.25.x, can't find 
> any 
> docs mentioning that.  Anyway the problem manifests itself in that simple 
> manifest:
> 
> ----
> import "auth.pp"
> 
> include ssh::auth
> 
> Ssh::Auth::Key { length => 4096 }
> 
> ssh::auth::key { 'foo': }
> 
> include ssh::auth::keymaster
> file { '/home/foo/.ssh': ensure => directory, mode => 700, owner => 'foo', 
> group => 'puppet' }
> ssh::auth::client { 'foo': group => 'foo' }
> ----
> 
> this is a simplified manifest which I ran with standalone puppet and it 
> produces the following error:
> 
> Only subclasses can override parameters at /root/puppet-
> tests/sshauth/auth.pp:113 on node ...
> 
> The problem here is the "group => 'foo'" param passed to ssh::auth::client.  
> It doesn't really matter which parameter it is though as the issue seems to 
> be 
> that the ssh::auth::client (or ssh::auth::server) define cannot override 
> properties of a resource declared in ssh::auth::key define.
> 
> I searched a bit for something on defines overriding parameters of resources 
> and found a thread here on puppet-users [1] which implies this isn't possible.
> 
> Does that work in 0.25.x ?

I'll have to spend a little time looking into this.  The whole purpose of
the way I set up the defines and virtual resources was to be able to
override parameters.  The last time I tried it, it worked.  I guess it's a
conflict with the file resource in your manifest?  I'll see what I can
figure out and get back to you.

Andrew.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to