Luke Kanies wrote: > On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Alan Sparks wrote: >> >> Since tidy does not have a parameter for directories or files to ignore, >> and there's no option to specify the types of files to consider, is >> there any way short of hacking the code to eliminate these errors? > > I don't think so. > > I basically threw that failure in there because I wasn't sure what the > behaviour should be for anything other than the standard file types. > It'd be pretty easy to fix tidy to behave appropriately if you can > describe how it should actually behave. >
Well, if it can be deleted, I'd think it is fair game. I'd say I really need, at least, /some/ exclusionary mechanism. If I had a complementary "exclude" pattern filter, I could probably solve most (if not all) of this issues. Some means of regex matching a basename... a potentially useful consideration might be a pruning mechanism, like "-prune" on "find." -Alan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
