On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Christopher Johnston <chjoh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am I missing something with mongrel though? It seemed straighfwd to me just > a custom httpd.conf you add the puppetmaster ports you want it to proxy too > and make sure the puppetmasters have the ports. > Or is it they passenger is more flexible?
When you're running with Passenger, to start/stop the service you're simply stopping/starting Apache. When you have multiple mongrel backends with pound/nginx/apache in front of them, you're managing multiple processes and services, which I find annoying. > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Jeff McCune <mccune.j...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Having used Webrick, Mongrel+(pound/nginx/apache) and Passenger+Apache >> all in production on 100+ hosts, I definitely recommend passenger. >> It's much easier to manage once it's up and running. >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Johnston >> <chjoh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ >> > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn't tested anything in >> > or >> > know who is maintaining it though. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael DeHaan wrote: >> >> > I'd like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built >> >> > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. >> >> >> >> Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- >> >> like a year and a half. It's held up due to bundled libraries (a >> >> similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). >> >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable >> >> to dispense it. >> >> -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971 >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Puppet Users" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Puppet Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
