Hmm..I didn't think about that. That does indeed appear to work.
Most interesting. Thanks! Trevor On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:47 PM, R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- "Trevor Vaughan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but I couldn't find it in a >> cursory search. >> >> If you have a module: >> >> /etc/puppet/modules/foo >> >> And you have a module: >> >> /etc/puppet/modules/bar/manifests/foo.pp >> >> Then all references to 'foo' within that namespace seem to scope down >> to the local foo; is this correct? >> >> So, in /etc/puppet/modules/bar/manifests/baz.pp, if I have the line: >> >> include 'foo' >> >> Then it will always grab 'bar::foo', not 'foo' as I desire. >> >> Is this by design, or a defect? > > By design I'd say, you can do: > > include ::foo > > to get the top level one. though there's a few points where the language > blows up with this syntax so your milage might vary > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 [email protected] -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
