On 28.06.2010 21:16, Peter Meier wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
1. Is this a good ideea? (if not why not?) From other discussions, I
know that this is how puppet should behave in general about type providers.
2. Should I open a ticket to add this new file for the apache module?
3. This seems trivial. Why wasn't it done for augeas/cron? Should I open
a ticket for those, possibly adding the code?
according to Luke @ puppetcamp Europe this is a problem that should be
fixed within puppet. So it should be possible to define that package
cron or apache should be installed and all the cron/a2mod depend on that
package and puppet shouldn't fail before.
I totally agree with this, but shouldn't the apache module work prior to
this happening in puppet? My big big question is if should I submit this
file to James, for the apache module? Looking from a practical viewpoint
augeas usually gets installed with puppet automatically, and cron is
probably already there. But on a new system to have apache already
installed is improbable.
Silviu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
