On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Douglas Garstang > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Eduardo S. Scarpellini > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Douglas, > >> I've started my tests with Python + Puppet Yaml yesterday, based on > >> > http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/[email protected]/2010-05/msg00539.html > , > >> and I'm having the same difficulties. > >> I shall keep working on this script today and I'll post the solution, if > I > >> can find it. > >> > >> > > > > Eduardo, > > That's about the only document I found on the subject too. I don't know > why > > the report document has to be so complicated. The !ruby tags are > completely > > unnecessary. I'm not about to go and learn ruby, as I dislike it > immensely. > > I guess it might be possible to pre-process the re > > Upon what basis are you saying that the Ruby tags are completely > unnecessary? > > On the basis that I've been able to strip them out, read in the yaml files with Python just fine, and get the data I need. Current date/time: 2010-10-04 17:41:21 ### Node Last Run(UTC) Delta Syntax Success Fail -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 app06.pax.xxxxxxxxx.com 2010-10-04 17:40 1 Ok 1 0 002 prov01.den.xxxxxxxx.com 2010-10-04 17:40 1 Ok 2 0 003 name02.den.xxxxxxxx.com 2010-10-04 17:39 2 Ok 1 0 004 rmon01.pax.xxxxxxxx.com 2010-10-04 17:39 2 Ok 1 0 005 jump01.den.xxxxxxxx.com 2010-10-04 17:39 2 Ok 1 0 Doug. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
