Try setting the checksum to undef (from what I understood this was
implemented in 2.6). How many files are in those folders? What order of
magnitude? tens of thousands, millions, under 1000?
Sidenote: The requires for parent folders are done automagically, you
don't need to specify them.
Silviu
On 06.10.2010 12:00, Angelos Oikonomopoulos wrote:
On 10/05/2010 06:58 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
You might want to try running the client with --evaltrace for
additional information.
Thanks. This didn't help much, as it's only printing out the
information after the resource evaluation, so I still have no idea
what it's doing when it gets stuck. However I've instrumented the
catalog application with unroller (suggestions for more appropriate
tools welcome) and I'm currently waiting for it to get to the
interesting parts (unroller slows things down much).
That said, I've also tried to figure out which part of my
configuration causes the issue. It turns out that if I comment out the
include of this class: http://paste.lisp.org/display/115229 in my node
definition the problem goes away. The class definition is an exact
copy of my actual definition, except for the s/<string>/foo/g. There
is an interesting coincidence here; my node definition is basically
node 'fqdn' inherits managed_node {
$openntpd_server = 'ntp.fpc.local'
include openntpd
include foohier
}
where
node managed_node {
include util_packages
ssh_authorized_key { "u...@host":
user => 'root',
ensure => present,
type => 'ssh-rsa',
key => 'AAAA...==',
}
user { "www-sync":
ensure => present,
allowdupe => false,
uid => <numeric id>,
}
}
and
class util_packages {
$packagelist = [8 packages with minimal dependencies]
package { $packagelist:
ensure => installed
}
}
notice that, by mistake, I'm not requiring User["www-sync"] in
foohier. The last line puppetd prints before it gets stuck is always:
info: /Stage[main]//Node[managed_node]/User[www-sync]: Evaluated in
0.00 seconds
I have no idea if this could be relevant. I very much expect this to
be a particularly creative error on my part, but of course this
failure mode is less than desirable :-)
TIA for any hints,
Aggelos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
