On Nov 16, 11:17 am, Rudy Gevaert <[email protected]> wrote: > Pachine parseable output would be very nice, but in my opinion not > that 'urgent'. We can parse it like it is.
I will add this as an option but not change the current output then. Later, when you've had a chance to update the provider to use the machine parseable output I can change the normal output more freely. > > I have changed the exit code to 0 (Rudy#10). > > Nice. From which version would this be? I have it checked into SVN so it will be in v2.3 but I haven't set a release date for it yet. Is it a showstopper for you? In that case I could roll a v2.2.1 for you with this. > An other issue that we need to tackle is which version(s) of pkgutil > will we support with the puppet provider? I really think you should use the --single option (as used in Maciej's provider) for comparison due to performance reasons and that was in v1.9, released roughly a year ago. /peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
