On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:24, Spenser Gilliland <spenser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've come into a use case where I need a list of all the instances of
> a definition. I'd like the syntax to be
[...]
> I'm not sure if this will work as anticipated. I believe that this
> will only update $instance in the test::instance scope not the test
> scope.
That would be about the shape of it.
[...]
> Can anyone help me figure this out? It seems like this would be a
> fairly common thing to do.
I strongly suspect it is actually kind of "not the puppet way", at
least at the moment. Can you tell us what the problem you are trying
to solve is? That would make it easier to help identify the more
canonical puppet way of doing whatever it is.
My guess is that there isn't a nice way of doing it and that answer is
going to be the "concat" module to build a file from little fragments,
or use the Ruby DSL, or something: I guess you need to reference all
those items in some other configuration file, and it doesn't provide a
"include this glob" operation, right?
Regards,
Daniel
--
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ dan...@rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
