On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Daniel Piddock <dgp-g...@corefiling.co.uk> wrote:
> I've done a bit of poking around the issue tracker. Issue 4473 > http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4473 appears to be the ticket related > to this. Unfortunately it looks like puppeteers expect this unusual name > resolution order, if they ever knowingly stumble upon it (e.g. 4483, 4472). > Either I need to hack around this problem carefully or wait a long time for > the next major release, if puppetlabs decide to follow the OO programming > crowd. I'm not sure if we can conclude that this is what the puppet community expects in terms of behavior. I would characterize it more as this being how things have worked for a long time, and so we need to be careful about changing such fundamental behavior. Please update http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4473 with your desired behavior so we can get a more accurate picture of how the community feels about this issue. It's in "Needs Design Decision" state precisely because we're not sure yet. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
