On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 13:20, Jason Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I would love to know what the details of your configuration are, including
>> web server version (Apache, Passenger, etc), and what timeouts you have
>> configured at that level.
[...]
Thanks for sharing those details. As I expected, none of that looks
like it should have any relationship with the failure, and helps me
eliminate some "is it slow I/O" from my early mental space to explore
to understand the problem.
> For the record, I can't actually upgrade to 2.6.x right now. My
> natural inclination would have been to have done so prior to starting
> this thread up in the first place but we have a defined type which
> uses "stage" as a parameter. This conflicts hilariously with run
> stages and I have to wait for an OS release with the fix to work its
> way through the pipeline before I can resume work on a 2.6.x upgrade.
By hilariously, how terrible is it? "Fails in nasty but obvious ways"
would be OK; "sets fire to your cat" would be pretty undesirable, and
would encourage me to think about how to better handle that in future.
Regards,
Daniel
--
⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
✉ Daniel Pittman <[email protected]>
✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775
♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
