On 2011/02/16, at 10:56, Felix Frank wrote: >> Adding an appropriate requires => to Devices::device_node >> instantiations, as suggested, should do the trick. Alternatively, the >> requires => could be put on one of the resources inside the defined >> type (in this case, the only candidate is the Exec). Personally, I >> prefer the latter whenever it is feasible, which in this case it is. > > Ah, but the OP tried the latter and received an error. Again, I don't > see why that is (possibly the manifest was censored in an unbecoming > fashion).
Nothing there was censored. As the original post noted, that is a stripped down but functioning proof of concept based on my original manifests. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
